>I was a little bothered by your claim. I've used chiropractors and the
>ones I've used are binned into the quack category, but have worked with
>both osteo and massage therapists and believe they are effective as a treatment
>for suitable problems.
That's why I threw an "almost" in my sentence. I know osteo can work, I've seen osteos in the past, but in general the field isn't founded on solid principles. The article you linked suggests that practitioners need to put patient well-being first, follow an evidence based approach, and be ready to discard outdated methods... I can't argue with that. |