On 14/07/2009 R James wrote:
>What a strange piece of logic. You think a model is valid until someone
>comes up with a better one. No go. A model stands on its own merits. If
>it fits existing data, and accurately predicts future data, it has some
>validity. If not, it's not acceptable, even if there are no alternatives.
I disagree 100% RJ. That does not follow the scientific principle at all. Read up on the null hypothesis and re write this post please. |