On 17/06/2009 R James wrote:
>I guess I've spelled out what would convince me earlier - some evidence
>of unusual climate based on long term, climate models that match real data,
>some evidence that positive feedback dominates negative feedback etc. So
>far, most of what I've found is hypothesis.
Well, at least you've given me something to have a swing at, but I suspect you've priced yourself out of the market with this wish list. I'll have a crack later though.
The haven't had a chance to look at the videos yet, but what ever their content, it would be very difficult to say for certain that Carter hadn't been bought out. As it is on either side of the argument. But the oil companies have some very high profile, and fairly public hired guns. Check out Chris Mitchell, editor of the Oz. Recently presented some award for journalistic integrity and coverage of 'Climate Science', sponsored by, guess who, the Australian Petroleum body. He was modest enough to put this on the front page of his paper too.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,25579486-7582,00.html
http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/05/and-the-wankley-goes-to-mitchells-climate-change-award/ |