On 17/06/2009 R James wrote:
>Plenty of scientists more qualified that myself have already told them.
It seems you're pretty sold there's no such thing. This is a shame for you personally, I see anger and disenfranchisement in your future, as everyone else pursues what you see as a futile crusade, with your money. Have you tried reading the IPCC Synthesis report with an open mind? It's very well written, and covers a very broad range of topics, including the influence of solar cycles, and may clear some things up. You're clearly not interested in hearing it from anyone else.
Note that I've tried to play devils advocate with my own position on this, but there genuinely isn't any serious science available that challenges the IPCC position. The Heartland Institute do the whole sceptics cause a terrible dis-service with their support for some pretty terrible science, and I just can't take anything that they say seriously. I would dearly love you to refer me to some peer reviewed analysis of the alternative science, but I genuinely haven't seen any. Is there any way you're likely to change your view? If not, there really is no point continuing this discussion. |