Author |
|
27-Sep-2011 1:41:27 PM
|
Looking to do some rock climbing (not Ice climbing!) at Blue Lake. At what time of year could I reliably say that it should be fine for normal climbing and the snow / ice will be gone?
|
27-Sep-2011 2:34:34 PM
|
On 12/09/2011 Wendy wrote:
>On 12/09/2011 a.brasington wrote:
>?
>>
>I wasn't aware that the UK had any decent winter climbing either. Aren't
>people struggling to get through the UK UIAA course because it has all
>this requisite Scottish winter climbing and Scotland hasn't had a decent
>season in years, thank you global warming?
Not at all.....the last few northern winters have had record snowfall which I guess doesn't fit the warmist paradigm. In 2009/10 I had a few good ice days in North Wales which in the past have been a rarity. Also had a few Scottish climbing days in 2008 curtailed because of too much snow.
As far as I'm aware most British guides struggle on the ski requirements, not the winter climbing part.
|
27-Sep-2011 2:51:15 PM
|
On 13/09/2011 davidn wrote:
>Now *this* is a slab that'd be worth climbing!
Pffft. A mikl Grade 10 dyno...
~> Though it does look like a cool problem ;-)
|
28-Sep-2011 10:21:24 AM
|
On 27/09/2011 maxdacat wrote:
>Not at all.....the last few northern winters have had record snowfall
>which I guess doesn't fit the warmist paradigm.
Yeah, and.. and the other day it was quite cold at my nana's house therefore global warming is a completely made up conspiracy.
You're an idiot.
|
28-Sep-2011 10:30:25 AM
|
On 13/09/2011 rodw wrote:
>And thats why you moved to the islands it was such a good incentive?
No, because there was limestone to be found, and someone had to do it. Just got promoted, the pay here is as good as Canberra now :-)
|
28-Sep-2011 11:55:04 AM
|
On 28/09/2011 uwhp510 wrote:
>On 27/09/2011 maxdacat wrote:
>>Not at all.....the last few northern winters have had record snowfall
>>which I guess doesn't fit the warmist paradigm.
>
>Yeah, and.. and the other day it was quite cold at my nana's house therefore
>global warming is a completely made up conspiracy.
>
>You're an idiot.
>
Actually it fits quite well, warmer oceans = more evaporation and greater precipitation(ie. snowfall).
|
28-Sep-2011 1:44:32 PM
|
On 28/09/2011 StuckNut wrote:
>On 28/09/2011 uwhp510 wrote:
>>On 27/09/2011 maxdacat wrote:
>Actually it fits quite well, warmer oceans = more evaporation and greater
>precipitation(ie. snowfall).
As long as the temperatures drop sufficiently for the greater evaporation to become snow when the stars align and both things happen at once...
We may just end up with bigger dumps that last for shorter periods of time (which is what I believe they expect to happen - more severe in shorter time frames)
|