Chockstone Forum

      Sponsored By
      ROCK
   HARDWARE

Chockstone Photography

Australian Landscape Prints

Chockstone Forum - Chockstone Feedback

Provide Feedback About This Website

Topic Date User

FYI Chockstoners - this weeks deletions, etc. 12-Nov-2018 At 11:45:32 AM Chockstone Moderator

Message

13/11/18 New user MigeTum (registration 8389), pre-emptively disabled SFS 68. Mostly British IPs used. 38 yo.

Edit 13/11/18 New user Andreasgmj (registration 8390), pre-emptively disabled. SFS 1,000. IPs Belarus. 38 year old.

2nd edit 13/11/18; New user shanti (registration 8391), pre-emptively disabled. SFS 3. IPs Philippines. 29 yo!

Edit 14/11/18; New user RuwTum (registration 8392), pre-emptively disabled. SFS 24. UK IPs. 38 yo. With two in two days it appears that the Tum family are spammers... or there’s only one who lies and is a slow learner.

2nd Edit 14/11/18 New User Ozchillout (registration 8393) Beach shade tent spam post deleted and user disabled.

[Thanks to another Moderator for the last one!]

Edit 15/11/18 New user EdisonUnect (registration 8394), pre-emptively disabled. SFS 249 from toxic disposable Russian IPs. Prefix Edison. 38 yo.

2nd edit 15/11/18; New user Jacobdic (registration 8395), pre-emptively disabled. SFS 205. Toxic disposable Russian IPs. Prefix Jacob. 38 yo.

3rd edit 15/11/18 New user kweeny (registration 8396), disabled and cannabis weight loss post deleted.
[Thanks to another Moderator for the last one.]

Edit 16/11/18 New user Bogdanjgo (registration 8397), pre-emptively disabled. SFS 1,000 from Belarus IPs. Prefix Bogdan. 38 year old slow learner that’s been here before.

Edit 17/11/18; New user XEvilBestMof (registration 8398), pre-emptively disabled. SFS 34. Lithuanian IPs. Prefix XEvilBest. 38 yo. I saw a comment on SFS database about this spammer having lots of activity in the last few days so with curiosity aroused I followed back the last of the 34 IP addresses used, and found that, that one alone appears in their database 509 times!
I’ve now learnt that a positive SFS count (no matter the number), for an individual spam registration actually represents the thin end of the wedge because the IPs used also have a lengthy history.
I shouldn’t be surprised. They just keep reinventing themselves...