On 11/06/2013 GWil wrote:
>Now, I'll admit that the wording has since been tidied up a little, but
>the sentiment remains the same in my eyes. It directly implies that untrained,
>and non-cohesive hikers/outdoorsmen will do a better job of searching for
>and successfully recovering a missing person than the recognised and official
>search force. It's a slap in the face for the efforts made by the NSW
>police, SAR groups, NSW Parks & Wildlife, SES, etc and I believe can easily
>be described as vigilante-style. Gung-ho, outside the law. The Police
>have acknowledged that they've got no way to stop people doing it, but
>they've not made a secret of the fact they disapprove.
Whoa, several unsubstantiated allegations there IMHO.
"a better job" - not necessarily but I think the family believes that any extra effort may make a difference. Surely you have more chance of finding someone if there are 300 people looking instead of 30?
"Gung-ho, outside the law". Outside what law? I note the posting asks searchers to register themselves.
I think this is a concerned family trying to do anything they can to maximise the chances of finding him. Good luck to them.
|