On 14/12/2016 WarwickB wrote:
>On 13/12/2016 simey wrote:
>>That sounds good Warwick. You establish some more headpoint wank routes
>>and I will come up and retro Alive in a Bitter Sea.
>>
>So, if I go and put up new routes, inspecting, rapping, and bolting them
>on rap, you will go and screw over an entirely different route contrary
>to the wishes of the person who did the first ascent? That's dictatorial,
>alt-right, bullying, and thuggery. Something I reject completely. As you
>might imagine, I don't respond well to being bullied and dictated to by
>some git I hardly know about something I've been doing for over 40 years,
>and which is important to me - climbing.
>
>A response like yours could well result in an epidemic of bolt chopping
>across the country as people return the rock everywhere to its natural
>condition so routes may be climbed from the ground up, or not at all.
>
I don't think it would be dictatorial. Simey hasn't reached dictator status yet. I would consider it more anarchistic. I think the person who did the first ascent always deciding what happens to a piece of rock afterwards is a bit colonialistic.
All the same, I hope the routes don't change. |