On 6/05/2015 climberman wrote:
>snacks, perhaps you need to write to Parks rather than expecting others
>to provide internal Parks docs to you.
>
>The 2001 POM is the current doc, for better or for worse.
I explained why I was asking... in truth I doubted something more specific and current existed.
Current? OK sure that's fine. But that's not the point. It doesn't deal with the specifics and only recommends that processes are put in place.
The commercial side was a higher priority for various reasons and you'll find more stuff on that quite easily. It's easier to handle and was important for Parks to have plenty of commercial operators to take care of people without increasing their liability...
No. I do not need internal documents sent to me via chockstone... links are fine... and above board.