On 7/03/2014 Duang Daunk wrote
>Shit mate, you are confusing me at least, if not other readers of your
>You made out that trad is environmentally worse and now you are defending
No, I never made out it was worse. It WAS suggested that it is definitely better and I just called BS on that argument.
>I agree that the access issue to base of climbs, no matter the genre,
>is a major issue.
>I disagree that any genre is worse in that respect on a genre basis.
>I do think that the numbers involved with any given genre have an imprtant
>bearing/impact, and can lead to worse environmental outcomes.
>>>Who has rammed whatever argument for/against down your throat that makes
>>>you so touchy?
>>>You are not a boulderer are you?
>>>Myaybe take a chill pill and lighten up, or are you simply shit stirring
>>>the chocky congregation again?
>>Again you are calling me a shit stirrer yet the number of remotely inflammatory
>>posts I have made over the years would be insignificant at best. Are
>>as sure about your posts?
>The number of posts has nothing to do with the basis of the post/s.
>Inflammatory has little to do with any shit premise that a post is based
>Do you not see that I am not calling you a troll, ie an inflammatoryposter I am mearly questioning your (questionable) logic.
(In an inflammatory manner....)
Interesting take on things, given that your logic is clearly flawed in assuming that I was defending any type of climbing or attacking any type of climbing in particular.