On 19/04/2012 kieranl wrote:
>Yep, that's fine. The problem with Mitre is not so much avoiding crossing
>climbs as finding suitable rap points that are safe to get to.
>
>I find it odd that people make such a fuss about an anchor that services
>a real need but don't complain about long-standing convenience anchors
>such as those above Salem. I wonder why one OK but not the other?
Salem is 18, Serpent is 10. Not that I agree.
Long standing? When did the Salem one go in? They weren't there when I climbed it 15 years ago.