>That would be pretty stupid. Simey rebolted a route and should be able
>to explain what and why he did so (which he has).
Incorrect - this climb has not be rebolted. Jenny Wren has been retro bolted. An explanation of what and why is a very different entity to just cause and justification.
>As far as I see it:
>1. crap gear should be replaced or removed (if modern gear makes it redundant),
>and moved if it was in a stupid position in the first place. Simey did
>this and good on him for doing so.
Incorrect - No bolt or fixed gear has been replaced on this route. No bolt or fixed gear has been moved this on this route. Not really sure if you understand what has been done at all.
>Perhaps an extreme antibolter could make a strong argument about one of
>the bolts, but it certainly doesn't warrant a chopping now that its been
>done (actually the rap station is debateable too).
A strong arguement proceeded with not warranting chopping because it has already been bolted?
Simey has already agreed that he would be happy to chop these bolts, apparently he's bring his camera.