>Pet dogs are not 100% part of the natural carbon cycle.
Hence the word "mainly"
1. Forest is destroyed and cattle are gain fed for dog meat?? I don't think so, as I said, dog meat is mostly by product from human food production, so it's rubbish to assume that all the meat that dogs eat come from cattle raised on ex-rainforest when calculating a carbon/eco footprint.
2. Yeah I know, that is correct. I don't really agree people owning lots of big dogs, but if you're going to argue against it, then at least use facts rather than hippy fiction.
3. I'm off to the Bluies to get spanked for the weekend - yipee! |