On 5/11/2009 simey wrote:
>On 5/11/2009 dalai wrote:
>>Can't believe the discussion has started arguing on the technicalities
>of # attempts made for the ascent!
>
>If the initial report hadn't mentioned 'third attempt' then the topic
>wouldn't be getting discussed. I couldn't care less, but I bought it up
>for discussion because it is very open to interpretation. It reads as though
>he has never been on any of the moves previously.
Ah yeah, that's how i interpreted it, but nevertheless, I couldn't give a shite either, the climbing is bloody impressive to watch. |