>until denialists put a credible model on the table, which explains observations
>and holds up to criticism, you can't expect to be taken seriously. otherwise
>you're just throwing stones.
>
What a strange piece of logic. You think a model is valid until someone comes up with a better one. No go. A model stands on its own merits. If it fits existing data, and accurately predicts future data, it has some validity. If not, it's not acceptable, even if there are no alternatives. |