On 11/04/2008 rodw wrote:
>IMHO....on top of that, even having a "female edition"
>is wrong in what should be a non gender orientated sport.
You can look at this in another way. Gender can be the form of topical discussion for the magazine, i.e. a feature on the Blue Mountains isn't produced to uphold that area against the dominant crags in Australia but instead to focus on it, bring to light the best, worst and banal that it can offer.
P.S. I haven't seen the mag yet. |