On 11/11/2003 tmarsh wrote:
>Didn't it recently get unbanned? I remember reading about it and seeing
>an interview with said jittery pentathlete, who said basically, I'm glad
>it kinda clears me after all these years, but hey it's water under the
>bridge anyway.
>
>Not that this is even remotely relevant to climbing.
>
>tim
Tim - had not heard that, perhaps it may be the case. From what I'm aware, urinary levels above 12 ug/ml are considered as doping....am most happy to be corrected though!
Bill
PS true, not really related to climbing....minor hijack in progress? |