On 14-May-2018 chalkischeap wrote:
,,,
>(The 500m idea is bizarre and sounds like the product of several sub-committees
>already.)
>
Thank you, though I doubt that any committee would be crazy-brave enough to suggest it. The tallest peak in the Grampians is a bit over 1,000m high, half that and round to the nearest hundred.
It's a non-judgemental dividing line. Cliffs aren't in because of any attribute related to their climbing profile, just their altitude. No subjective decisions required.
|