On 7/03/2017 MisterGribble wrote:
>Andy, this is an errrrrrr..... Rock Climbing Forum ?????
>
That's as maybe Br Miggle but seriously, I mean, honestly! Not many people actually talk about clock rhyming on here and if they do its usually Nati v Blueys sh*te nine times out of ten anyway.
Maybe time for a social/pub/cafe area on here (Mods?) coz I don't climb so can't really join in there hey.
At least my post teased KieranL out of the woodwork ...which is more than I can say for most (Hi KL, hope all's well).
Anyway; back on topic: Little Green Man or Little Green Woman? What a complete & utter load of effin' B*LL*X and a waste of Our money - the money KL suggests is not much in the scheme of things. It's only around $860,000.00 for a handful for the 'test'. I'd've done it for $750k over the weekend! Times that by Every Single Pelican crossing in Victoria and soon see where our (your actually, not all but I voted otherwise) Premier spends Our money. New regional hospital for the kiddies or aged 'Dan'? 'Nah mate, not me faction'.
Now; to end on a less sour note; Am not against "gender equality" but the above green man/green woman example is beyond ridiculous. I shan't dare comment on behalf of the fairer sex but would hazard a guess the consensus from our (few) lady members would be a preference to spend the money on breast or ovarian cancer research rather than f*ckn traffic light signs.
What has 'Victoria.The Laughable State' come to?
Can't wait for the 'sensitive types' to respond to the above with Any, Remotely-Valid or commonsense reasons why traffic lights are more valuable to All society than cancer research for our Mums, sisters, daughters or lady friends.
Back to 'Dan': 'Sorry mate, hospital budget cuts, couldn't afford the chemo for your ex girlfriend - traffic lights to change for me left-wing radical female voters mate and jobs for the militant union". F*ck off. Just F*ck off and get real for heaven's sake.
Oi! Who nicked me coat ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
|