On 8/02/2013 Andrew Davis wrote:
>Whitetrash and shortman, when i started writing this thread i thought i
>would get some quick negative and smart arse answers, you didn't disappoint,
>or maybe i should say you are so predictable.
your lack of engagement and flippancy in your posts, dispite your claims of engagement and cohesion , are becoming annoying andrew. almost as annoying as if you retrod the bufalo routes and broke off the flake on pintle.
there was nothing negative in others and my legitimate questions an they still stand .
you sound almost as fragile as the flake was on pintle!
if you dont refute the allegations then we can only assume that you are the culprit responsible and if that is the case , then my blessings go to any who would chop your retroroutes.
>i enjoyed reading the other
>remarks, some informative some just fun, thanks. When i got into climbing
>in 2000- 2001 i spent quite some time scrolling through this blog on a
>number of occasions, but it wasn't a welcoming place and i decided its
>not worth sticking around. Im encouraged to hear one new climber has found
>value being here. Im now a member of 2 facebook groups dedicated to climbing,
>and i agree you still want some of your privacy but just a real face and
>a name people know you by reduces the aggression, arguments, misunderstanding,
>assumptions and judgments. And the rude angry ananymous people dont find
>it so easy to vent on others
here is another question. are you upset by my chockstone identity an that why you dont respond? |