>As for some of the other examples mentioned in previous posts, ie routes finishing at >a bail point, it isn't a question of re-naming. It's a question of whether you consider >such a piece of climbing to be a "climb" that exists in its own right.
BA, with what you're saying, do you think it might become a feasible practice as the grades get insanely higher to name pitches or successful bounds separately and then maybe the first person to complete the entire route gets the right to name the thing as a whole? What are people's thoughts on this? |