On 20-Nov-2017 Dave J wrote:
>(more) the shift from
>the old system to the new one...he is just one of a small handful who haven't
>walked away because of the gradual change. Maybe because of what it was,
>maybe to and try and slow the slide, maybe because he cant see a viable
>alternative and there still needs to be a few competent people in the group
>for there to be any chance of saving people at the mount.
>
>(more)
1st off , hats off to ARG for excellent service over the years, and may they not Rest In Peace!
gov is good at trying on the one size fits all approach an that hand slips neatly in the glove of liturdation chasing numbers game by simple rules like 80% benefits for 20% work , ohs, certifying etc.
gov knows the system could be better but individualising subsystems is rare due cost , time and general gov apathy.
Our trouble is that for them to wake up, truly consult local knowledge and experience and work to support it, is gunna take a casualty to be the sacrificial victim instigating a gov official enquiry.
In spite of bureaucracy , may there always be heroes.
Another slippery slope? Where’s Wendy an her common sense to sort it out for us? |