On 4/05/2015 E. Wells wrote:
>How could they. Seriously, Im genuinely curious how they could possibly
>officially approve any bolting in the litigious society we live in. No
>climber could equip a route. It would involve all the overpriced 'expertise'
>that has already been mentioned, which infuriates me just as much as arborists
>justifying they're lowlife 10/50 jobs with similar payrates. Lets consider
>whats at stake here. The developers are devastated as you would expect
>but who really wants NPWS to administer a park wide ban. I like the crag
>too , its peaceful (except for the days that beta spraying wanker took
>his dog , then told his daughter that those complaining were just 'negative'
>urrrrgh)
Look I agree that there is no point antagonising NPWS over this, and personally I can see where they are coming from with this situation. But given that (presumably) they won't approve any bolting even in a place that isn't going to attract other park uses, I can see why someone bolting wouldn't inform them if their automatic response is going to be 'No'.